Saturday, January 30, 2010

Obama: Cutting deficit as important as job growth


WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama said Saturday that trimming budget deficits is as important as creating jobs, his top domestic priority this year, to continue the economic recovery that appears under way.
The government reported Friday the economy grew at an annual rate of 5.7 percent in the final three months of 2009. It was the second consecutive quarter of growth and the fastest rate in more than six years.
"A sign of progress," Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address. "But as we work to create jobs, it is critical that we rein in the budget deficits we've been accumulating for far too long."
Hammered by Republicans for billions of dollars in spending that added to the deficit, Obama outlined steps he said would rein in spending. They include rules requiring that spending or tax cuts be offset by cuts to other programs or tax increases, a freeze on most discretionary spending and a presidentially appointed commission to recommend ways to reduce the deficit.
Obama said "pay-as-you-go" rules that were in place in the 1990s led to surpluses at the end of the decade. But after Congress eliminated the rules, Obama said the result was the $1.3 trillion deficit he faced upon taking office in January 2009.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has predicted a deficit of about the same size for the 2010 budget year.
"Reinstating this law will help get us back on track, ensuring that every time we spend, we find somewhere else to cut," Obama said.
The Senate voted Thursday to reinstate the rules. The House must still act on the measure.
Obama also has proposed a three-year freeze on most domestic spending, beginning in the budget year that starts Oct. 1. Spending related to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and national security would be exempt.
The president also promised to create a "fiscal commission" to develop ideas for reducing the deficit.
But his plan would be weaker than a now-defeated Senate proposal that would have created such a commission and required Congress to vote on its recommendations. There is no way to force Congress to vote on recommendations from a presidential panel.
The Senate defeated the measure when anti-tax Republicans and Democrats leery of being railroaded into cutting Social Security and Medicare voted against it.

Toyota Shows How Giants Stumble


.Toyota Shows How Giants Stumble
Buzz up! 68 Print..By Rick Newman , On Friday January 29, 2010, 2:18 pm EST
At General Motors, they used to call their surging competitor "Mr. T," as if intimidated by a muscular rival who seemed able to seize market share at will. But Toyota suddenly looks pretty meek, thanks to a mystifying safety problem that has led to a huge recall, an unprecedented production shutdown, and an ugly dent in a once sterling reputation.
This corporate nightmare has mushroomed since last fall, when Toyota recalled about 4 million vehicles because of floor mats with a propensity to slip down into the driver's side foot well, potentially interfering with the pedals and causing sudden acceleration. Now Toyota has recalled an additional 2.3 million vehicles for a problem that sounds similar, but the company says it's different: faulty gas pedals that can stick if they become worn, causing--once again--sudden acceleration.
Recalls aren't unusual. Here's what normally happens: The owner gets notified of the recall and brings the car to a dealer, where the problem is fixed in a day or two with no charge to the customer. But this recall is more confusing and far more draconian than usual. For one thing, Toyota announced the recall before there was a fix in place, so dealers didn't even know what to do if you brought them the car. Toyota implies that most of the recalled vehicles can still be driven safely, but it also offers these instructions for people who feel their car might have a sticky gas pedal: "The vehicle should be driven to the nearest safe location, the engine shut off, and a Toyota dealer contacted for assistance." Beyond that, Toyota has also issued some Dukes of Hazzard style maneuvers drivers should use if they're cruising along and the pedal does, in fact, stick, such as shifting into neutral or turning off the ignition (but don't take the key out!). Do they teach that in driver's ed?

If you're a concerned parent with a suspect Toyota, you could easily imagine that the gas pedal seems a little stickier than usual. And do what? Risk your kids' lives by driving them around in a death trap? Pull off on the side of the highway and call a taxi? Garage the car and rent something safe--at $300 per week--until Toyota figures out what's going on? Stressing out your customers like that isn't exactly the way to win repeat business.

The sales and production stoppage suggests an even bigger problem, with lots of legal liability. Toyota has stopped selling or building eight models, including the Camry, Corolla, and RAV 4, which represent more than 50 percent of its sales. That will cost Toyota millions, maybe billions, of dollars. It already ranks near the top in the annals of corporate meltdowns, and it's not necessarily over. GM, meanwhile, is poaching Toyota customers with special financing and other incentives, along with cars that go the speed you want them to.

[See 10 products that boomed during the recession.]

How did this happen? Toyota itself may not even know yet, and it could take months or years for the full story to develop. But Toyota's dramatic comedown isn't as sudden as it might seem. Some industry-watchers feel the saga has been building for years and may even have been inevitable.

In his 2009 book, How the Mighty Fall, business guru Jim Collins outlined five stages of decline that many big companies go through. Mostly he wrote about companies that lose their edge gradually, even imperceptibly, until thousands of tiny termite holes bring down the house. Toyota might qualify as an accelerated version of such a collapse.

Toyota has grown steadily into the world's biggest automaker, earning customer loyalty for the reliability and longevity of its vehicles. But problems have been slowly building. The T100 pickup sold in the 1990s failed to hit Toyota's usual mark for quality, with some critics complaining that it was an underpowered make-do truck that paled next to American counterparts. Beginning around 1999, thousands of Toyota owners complained about mysterious "sludge" buildup that wrecked their engines, prompting criticism that Toyota was growing too fast and skimping on quality; Toyota resisted the claims but settled a class action lawsuit brought by owners in 2007. Toyota owners have also complained about faulty head lamps on the Prius hybrid, and more than 100,000 Tundra pickups were recalled in 2009 for problems with rusting frames. On the business side, Toyota badly miscalculated when it built a new pickup plant in Texas, with sales far below projections.

[See 21 things we're learning to live without.]

Consumers have noticed. Surveys by CNW Marketing Research in Brandon, Ore., show that from 1997 to 2007, Toyota consistently ranked at the top for nonluxury car makers, neck and neck with Honda. For 10 straight years, consumers rated Toyota 9.1 or higher, on average, out of 10. In 2008, that rating slipped below 9 for the first time, and in the latest survey--which took place before the gas-pedal recall--respondents gave Toyota an 8.5 rating. That's lower than the ratings for Honda, Buick, Mazda, Volkswagen, Ford, and even Saturn.

Toyota's recent history lines up fairly well with Collins's taxonomy of decline. His first stage is "hubris born of success," which certainly could apply to Toyota. For years, Toyota was a model of efficient manufacturing, mimicked even by firms in different industries. That may have convinced the firm's leaders they could grow rapidly and maintain quality at any size. Next in the evolution of decline comes "undisciplined pursuit of more." Toyota definitely had grand ambitions--to become the world's biggest automaker--but it's not clear yet if the firm was undisciplined or simply took risks that went against it. Collins's third stage is "denial of risk and peril," which many critics certainly saw in Toyota's rigid refutation of consumer complaints. Stage four is "grasping for salvation," which is what Toyota seems to be doing now.

[See 4 things that could derail a recovery.]

It's a safe bet, however, that Toyota will escape Collins's fifth stage: "capitulation to irrelevance or death." Despite its woes, Toyota remains a strong brand and a powerful company, and falling on its sword today may be the best path toward a corporate rebound. Surveys by BrandIndex, a market research firm, show that Toyota's "buzz" score--reflecting consumers' immediate perception of the brand--have dipped to historic lows. But positive impressions of Toyota still outweigh negative ones, which means customers are likely to return if the company solves its problems once and for all--and makes amends. "Consumers are pretty forgiving of blue-chip brands," says Ted Marzilli of BrandIndex. "Prospects are still quite good for Toyota, provided the issue is resolved quickly, there is clear communication to consumers, and there are no more issues in the near future." And humility replaces hubris.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Apple's iPad event: What we didn't get


Apple's just-announced iPad looks like an iPhone on steroids, and it boasts a price tag that's a lot lower than people feared. But many of the enticing rumors about Apple's new tablet—such as chatter about a built-in camera, monthly TV subscriptions, and support for Verizon's 3G network—turned out to be dead wrong. Also: no iPhone for Verizon, at least not yet.
You can check out the details on the new iPad right here, and don't get me wrong: judged on its own, away from all the gargantuan hype, and considering its $499 price tag (for the 16GB model), Apple's new tablet is certainly one sexy piece of gadgetry.
But ... is it a category-changer, like the iPod and the iPhone before it? That'll be hard to judge right away, and I still need to see the thing in person before I start making any sweeping generalizations.
That said, some of the coolest would-be features that had been rumored for the iPad failed to materialize Wednesday, starting with ...
No 3G support for Verizon
One of the earliest rumors about the iPad (which I'd still rather call the iTablet) was that it would come with embedded 3G support in addition to Wi-Fi. Well, the 3G part was true (monthly pre-paid plans will start at $14 for 250MB of data, or $29/month unlimited), but alas, no Verizon; instead, we're stuck with good 'ole AT&T which is either a good or a bad thing, depending on how you feel about AT&T).

No jaw-droppingly new user interface
One of the most amazing things about the original iPhone was its ground-breaking touch interface; just pinch to zoom into a Web page! Tap to turn on the speakerphone! Swipe to flip through your photos! So maybe it was only natural that many of us gadget hounds (myself included) thought that Apple would come up with some new, "Minority Report"-style interface for the iPad ... perhaps some cool haptic feedback for the virtual QWERTY keypad, or maybe (as outlined in some recent patent filings) the ability to sense a finger that's hovering near the screen but not touching it. What we got, instead, was ... pretty much the same touch UI as on the iPhone, except with a lot more room. Not bad, but not all that revolutionary, either.
No built-in camera
The iPhone has a camera, the MacBook has a camera ... heck, even the new iPod Nano has a camera (well, a video-only camera, anyway). So, what about the iPad? Ahhh ... nope, and that's especially disappointing given the chatter from the Wall Street Journal that Apple has been toying with facial-recognition software that could potentially be used to, say, identify the various members of your family and deliver their own, customized iPad interface.
No Flash support
When, oh when, Apple, will you let us view Flash videos and Web modules on the mobile version of Safari? Who knows, but it's definitely not starting with the iPad, which is just as bereft of Flash support as the iPhone and iPod Touch are.
No user-replaceable battery
Steve Jobs claims that the iPad will come with an impressive 10 hours of battery life and a full month of stand-by time. Pretty cool, but as with the iPhone, the iPod Touch, and the latest MacBooks, the iPad battery comes sealed in the case, and there's no way to swap in a new one yourself.
No TV subscriptions
One of the more intriguing recent rumors was that Apple was going around to all the TV and cable networks, trying to sell them on the idea of monthly TV subscriptions that viewers would be able to watch on iTunes, the iPhone, Apple TV, or ... the iPad. Word even had it that Disney's Bob Iger was in San Francisco today, all set to announce a new content deal with Apple, but ... nope, didn't happen. (The writing for this non-event was on the wall, thanks to a recent New York Times story that reported that TV execs looked over Apple's subscription proposals and said "thanks, but no thanks.")
No iPhone software 4.0 announcement
Yet another interesting rumor had it that the reason that there hadn't been a big iPhone software update lately was that the new code was too intertwined with the iPad OS, and therefore we'd get a big announcement today for iPhone software 4.0—complete with full-on app multitasking, UI enhancements, and other goodies. The rumor sure sounded plausible (and hey, the part about the new iPhone software being closely interwoven with the iPad may well be true), but the Apple event came and went Wednesday, with nary a sign of iPhone software 4.0
Last but not least ... no iPhone for Verizon
Besides the iPad itself, the Apple rumor that seemed to generate the most excitement was the possibility that Steve Jobs would announce the end of Apple's exclusive iPhone deal with AT&T ... and announce an iPhone for Verizon at the same time. After all, most believe that the Apple-AT&T deal is set to expire this summer anyway, so why not get a jump on the news? But as with the talk about the iPad coming with support for Verizon's 3G network ... well, maybe we'll get a Verizon iPhone in June or July, but we didn't see one today.
So, what were you hoping for Wednesday that didn't quite happen?

Friday, January 15, 2010

Taco Bell is Cheating Customer




Have you ever been to Taco Bell.Well i did the survey.Not just survey i have actually eaten at Taco Bell for few years because i thought food was cheap.Well after eating there long enough i have figured out so many things.The reality of Taco Bell food.First of all have you ever noticed that whats cheap in Taco bell.Well its Beans,Rice and ground beef which we do noteven know what grade is it.A reader sent us the contents of a Better Business Bureau complaint filed against Taco Bell. It describes how a customer tried repeatedly to find out what grade beef Taco Bell uses in its food, and how nobody at the company was able or willing to provide an answer. Not surprisingly, the BBB complaint also went unanswered. Let's just hope they're not sourcing their beef from forklift cattle, which is like downer cattle but has odd prong-shaped bruises on the side.

About 3 weeks ago i called the 800# asking what grade of beef they use. All they could tell me was usda approved. I called 4 times and got the same, twice i left my # and was told a nutritionalist would call me back....no call ever came. I next e mailed corp with the same question. I was answered by a Sandy Shakelford telline me:I have located a phone number contact in which you can inquire about our meat. Taco Bell Corporation 949-863-4500 and ask for the QA Department. I called a total of three times first got a prompt telling me to put in MY voice mail # to get my messages. Next i was transfered to a recording telling of bad cheese both plain and mixed and to throw them out and call in for a credit. Third was disconected. 4th i got a voice mailbox in the Quality control dept. i think his name was Steve...Again i left my question and # and again no call back. On Feb 27 i e mailed Sandy telling her what my phone experiance was and had not got an answer to my question...That was 10 days ago and again no contact from Sandy nor Taco Bell. Side note the web sight says contact us call 1800 TACO BELL when its actually 800 TACO BEL....The companys resistance to answer my question tells me what i was told by a friend that worked there that they use poor yet usda approved beef could be true.
Wellthats just part of the quality.Now let get to the product.Every time you go to Taco bell you will not have same quality of the food.They just cant keep up with the quality.As time is passing away Taco bell is putting less and less meats in there food.Most of the rice and beans you feel if you eat there.If you try to get chicken in you food that cost you an arm.I dont think Taco bell food is healthy at all.Cheap crap is cheap enough for bad economy.No one knows what we are eating at Taco bell.
Since all that i have stoped wasting my money at Taco bell and you should to.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Do you really think hybrids save you money?



Do you really think that if you buy hybrid cars they will save you lots of money.Its some what true but have you ever Notice how much the Toyota prius cost these day.$28000.This car used to be $18000 few years back.Now thing to realize is that this hybrid has very little power.Its like suicide attempt on yours self if you take it to the highway.Well you are paying for gas in advance if you notice.That car worth $15000 and is sold for almost $30000.00.Thats like $14,000.00 extra which you are not even going to use for gas in 5 years.Companies are too smart and we all are unaware of it.Hybrids are saving the enviorment thats all.I know not many people are buying hybrids not because they care about the air its because they think they will save money on gas.Auto makers sux.In the name of saving gas they charge lots of money which you worked hard for.we are being brain washed.We don't look at the details these days.So we pay the price.JUST THINK ABOUT IT

Companies putting up Fake sales




Wake up America.Why are still running behind sales?I know one reason for that is because people dont go to same store every day for 30 days so you dont know how these compaines are playing with all of us.Every time you go to any a clothing store for example do you ever notice if they have moved the racks arund or what was there on that rack last time.Answer is no.First week you will see the shirt for $40.Second you will see 50% off has retail price of $70.Next time you go there you will see the same item buy one for $69.99 and get one for a penny which sounds like our Black friday sale.Every time price stayed the same.You will surely find cheap cloths but they will be over size 2x or 3x.How about electronics sale.How many times have you checked the price of the tv that went on sale for $350 on black friday.I know it was the same before Black friday and will stay the same after black friday.Not just that good brand is never on sale like sony or samsung.What on sale vizio or projecta which most people have never heard of.Come on people stop standing in line for fake sales.There arn't any sales.Groccery store have there sale only when food is about to expire.Why we still cant't get back on our feet.Why companies are still going out of business or loosing sales,Because i think people are either getting smart shoppers or they don't have money.What ever reason it is just becareful.Only place you can get The best sale is at Good will store.Why do you find branded stuff cheap from T.J Max or Ross?Not because the companies had too much of it.Its because that stuff was used either in fashion shows or is little damaged or bad quality.I hope every one gets my point and start focusing on sales. Have a smart shopping spree.

Why No one supports small business

Living with the bad economy is definatly hard.How many times have we heard that big fish eats little fish.Same thing with small business owners.NO ONE HELPS SMALL BUSINESS i mean no one.Take the banks for example.They dont give any kind of loans to any small business because they think it is just too much risk to loan a small company.They could be right but not always.So if any average person wants to open a business will have to work 20 years to make enough money to open there own business.Which is almost half of your life.Now lets go to the vendors who provide the business the merchandise for there store.

They will always charge double the amount for the product they are charging chain stores.One thing is understandable that more you buy cheaper it get,But my point is how can a small business survive in these conditions.If i dont have a job and have some money to open a tiny business i am sure i will get no help from any bank or any vendor.Still there are so many companies who still believe in small business.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Credit card companies shouldn't charge Late fees

Well as we all know credit card debt is the worst thing to have.Interest rates are terrible but late fees makes it even harder to pay of the debt.I know thats the way credit companies work.It is there business so owe cant blame them to make money of high interest,but do you think late fees is legal or fair with us.Well i dont think so why because first of all if i miss the payment for one full months that will be unfair with the credit companies who lend you the money.What i am saying is credit card companies charge you the late fees just after one day if you have missed a payment.First thing is why people use credit cards.There are several reasons.they dont have any extra money to spend on the thing they really want or some people use it because its convenient to use it then writing a check or taking the money out of your pocket.When the time comes to pay that is the time for the credit companies to make money.They will do any thing to charge you as much extra they can.there is no tolerance for being late.Lets make the story short.Take the example of if a person used a credit card



because he doesn't make enough money to use for some stuff.Its easier for him to pay a little amount every month.Here is the best part.What if i couldn't get the money in time to pay the credit card bill.there i have $40 late charge and the extra interest.How do you think i can pay that extra money if where i didn't even had enough money to pay off the minimum payment due.So the distruction of your credit starts from here and the companies.Now i will be either late or will be unable to pay the whole amount every month.That will really build up my balance due.Nothing you can do about it.Companies will start harrasing you every day.You can beg or cry to them if they could help you in any way.They will say NO.What happens they end up loosing more then a half of there money by selling my account to a collection agency and my credit also gets messy.Both parties lose in this case.Thats where our economy is going.Every company is just greedy and want to just take last drop of blood out of you.As i recommend if you can avoid using credit cards please do,Because its easy to use one but wayyyyyyyy harder to pay of.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Should we stop calling 911



The question is should we stop calling 911 for every little disturbing or non disturbing thing.Guess not.As i have seen some Tv shows about people calling 911 for some stupid reasons like on this web http://www.aol.com.au/lifestyle/story/Fla-man-arrested-for-calling-911-asking-for-sex/2394169/index.html is the guy trying to find a sex partner by calling 911 or a guy like this who called 911 to get a ride to the bar http://thehiphopconsultant.wordpress.com/2009/12/31/tampa-man-gets-tasered-for-calling-911/
I know that these above stories shows that people do call 911 for some stupid reasons,But what i am going to talk about is what i have experienced with Americas top cell phone companies like At&t T-Mobile or verison.Let take At&t for example.Few months back i bought a new cell phone with new contract.The dealer asked me if i wanted to have an insurance on the phone and i said no.He started telling me about how good is it to have an insurance.It looked appetizing to me so i said go ahead sell it to me.I payed $55 to have the best insurance they had that even covered the water damage.Here is the real part.4 months later i was traveling to different state and got into a horrible accident and lost some of my stuff including my phone.But i was't worried about the phone ,because i know i have insurance.so a week later i called at&t to get my new cell phone.They required $40 to have a new one.So after talking to the lady for 15 minutes explaining every thing she was like ok you phone will be there in 2 weeks all we need from you is a police report,Phone IMEI# and so on.I asked her how do i get the lost report.She says call 911 and report it and then they will have a police report .you take that report and fax it to us.Now tell me other reasons were stupid,but tell me if this reason is any better.Its not every one who feels like calling 911.Its the companies polices that force every one to call 911.At the end we as an average people gets the blame.Next thing you know a program on tv is up about people like us.